No. We have intentionally built the tool to not do this. We want you to be able to handpick your coverage and then compile a report based on that.
Too many fully automated monitoring + dashboard solutions pickup irrelevant mentions. Or miss things entirely. Creating metrics + graphs people don’t end up trusting.
There is a reason most monitoring tool users end up collating a clean list of actual coverage in a spreadsheet! We are the alternative to that tracker spreadsheet. And then some...
If I have to find the coverage myself, why do so many people love CoverageBook?
We have lots of customers that just don’t need a fully fledged media monitoring tool. Many bookmark the URLs of their mentions as they discover them via Google news, AI agents (Gemini, Claude or OpenAI) or from the person that wrote about them. Then they paste those links into CoverageBook. And are ready to measure & showcase their work back to clients.
On the other end of the scale we have huge teams that need a solution to consolidate all the mentions they collect across multiple tools. They find consolidating a clean list of Coverage in our tool gives them the data consistency they crave!